Economic Benefits of No Kill

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MYTH: No Kill is too expensive. Our community cannot afford it.

FACT: No Kill is cost-effective, fiscally responsible, and a great economic boon to local communities. Municipalities which want to enact good policy and improve the local economy should invest in lifesaving at their local shelter. Given the cost savings and additional revenues of doing so (reduced costs associated with killing, enhanced community support, an increase in adoption revenues and other user fees, and additional tax revenues), as well as the positive economic impact of adoptions, a community cannot afford to embrace No Kill.

There are hundreds of open-admission municipalities across the nation who have achieved No Kill success. These communities not only prove that No Kill can be achieved at “open admission” municipal shelters in both urban and rural, Northern and Southern, large and small, and both politically liberal and conservative communities, but also that No Kill is consistent with a municipal shelter’s public safety mandate. They also disprove the idea that communities with high intake rates can’t be No Kill because of the antiquated and disproven notions of “pet overpopulation” and the “irresponsible public.”

Although costs vary somewhat, impounding, caring for, and ultimately killing an animal and disposing of his/her body costs approximately $106.00 ($66 for impoundment and $40 for killing and disposal). The process is entirely revenue negative to the municipality in contrast to the No Kill approach which transfers costs to private philanthropy, brings in adoption revenue and other user fees, and supports local businesses.

In just one community, a No Kill initiative yielded $250,000 in increased revenues at a time the shelter also significantly reduced expenditures. In addition, the positive economic impact to businesses due to subsequent spending by adopters on those animals totaled over $12,000,000 in sales annually. Over the course of the lifetime of those animals and subsequent adoptions, it is estimated that these animals will generate $300 million, bringing in over $20,000,000 in sales tax revenues.

Does it make more economic sense to adopt out animals, transfer animals to private non-profit rescue organizations, and increase the number of stray animals reclaimed by their families, all revenue positive activities that save the costs of killing and bring in fees and other revenues? Of course it does. At a time when dozens of communities across the country have achieved No Kill, including those with per capita intake rates up to eight times higher than New York City, shelters which continue to kill in the face of lifesaving alternatives are not only engaging in morally bankrupt conduct (killing animals who have a place to go), they are bankrupting community coffers. No Kill animal control not only makes good sense.

It makes dollars and cents.

Click here to learn more about the Economic Benefit of No Kill.

_________________________________________________________________________

Under current shelter leadership, MCACC has killed over 185,000 animals, which has cost Maricopa County taxpayers over $19,610,000. It is inhumane, cruel, and fiscally irresponsible to continue to systematically kill shelter animals when there is proven No Kill success across the nation.

MCACC leadership refuses to put an end to systematically killing and continues to be fiscally irresponsible by blatantly wasting taxpayer dollars.

This is YOUR shelter leader, Maricopa County residents. The one that blames YOU for the killings.

It is time for change in our community. It is time to reject the failed philosophies and poor performance of the past. It is time to put and end to the killings in our shelter.

Learn how your voice can help make Maricopa County No Kill as fast as humanly possible http://bit.ly/1mjDrTn

 

 

 

not to embrace No Kill.